AssignedWitchAtBirth
11:22 AM Apr 04, 2024 EST Edited: 11:23 AM Apr 04, 2024 EST


"On April 24, the consolidated cases Idaho v. United States and Moyle v. United States will be heard at the U.S. Supreme Court. “This case concerns whether a State can prevent pregnant women from receiving the essential emergency medical treatment that federal law guarantees to all Americans” under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). [1]

“EMTALA’s promise is limited but profound: No one who comes to an emergency room in need of emergency medical care should be denied the treatment required to stabilize her condition. For some pregnant women suffering tragic emergency complications, the only care that can prevent grave harm to their health is termination of the pregnancy. In those circumstances, EMTALA requires participating hospitals to offer such care—yet Idaho law forbids it. EMTALA accordingly preempts state laws like [Idaho Law] Section 18-622 to the extent they prohibit the essential medical care required by federal law.” [2]

This latest foray by the Court “into the legality of state laws criminalizing abortions will force them to wrestle with a fundamental question — are pregnant women entitled to the full protection of the law?” [3]"

See link: https://www.reprotruth.com/p/emtala-the-supreme-courts-next-big

 
1
  
 
0

pic


Your comment cannot be posted right now. Please check your internet connection.










By RadicalCatMom at 09:37 PM Apr 21, 2024 EST
12
59
By RadicalCatMom at 10:32 AM Apr 17, 2024 EST
0
33
By RadicalCatMom at 09:37 AM Apr 17, 2024 EST
7
78
By Fandar at 02:47 PM Apr 13, 2024 EST
3
27
By AssignedWitchAtBirth at 11:26 AM Apr 07, 2024 EST
3
45
By RadicalCatMom at 12:00 AM Apr 04, 2024 EST
9
81
By RadicalCatMom at 10:41 PM Apr 01, 2024 EST
9
56
By RadicalCatMom at 10:34 PM Apr 01, 2024 EST
6
92
By Boxmile at 07:19 AM Mar 31, 2024 EST
1
36
By RadicalCatMom at 01:18 PM Mar 28, 2024 EST
2
45


© 2024 FemiNuremberg